Sorry, something went wrong. We're still having some internal discussions about what we could do to try to fix or mitigate this type of breakage. I'm curious why is twitter able to load images from pbs. I guess it's not unilaterally blocked? We allow twitter. We have a pull request to re-categorize pbs.
I understand the reason behind the block, but if there's any workaround you can tell me I'd really appreciate it. Domain blocked: pbs. Skip to content. Star New issue. Jump to bottom. Labels breakage enhancement needs:product. Linked pull requests. Copy link. Just some updated data: pbs. Is there any update on this? This seems like a pretty serious breakage.
Hi everyone, is there any update? As the tools and platforms evolve, we will uphold our editorial standards, and we will continue to inform and engage the American public in the pressing issues of the day. This all matters because an informed public that understands how news is gathered -- and trusts honest media organizations -- is essential to a functioning democracy.
Even some of my friends and family have reposted items gleaned from something called PBS. You know who you are. I invite you now to stop. The material is dangerous. The real PBS. Some in our audience have become concerned enough to ask us if PBS was really endorsing some outlandish statements.
The most recent alert came from a person, who recently and rather innocently asked for our help in obtaining permission from PBS to repost an image that encouraged mask-wearing during the pandemic. This one seemed well-intentioned, but its source is an X factor and the encounter illustrates how easy it is to misconstrue the source of a given piece of information.
Here are two more, emblematic inquiries we have received from viewers confused by PBS. If so please help me to find this article on the website PBS. I'll thank-you in advance for the help. Just after I got that one, I got a post that is anti-Trump. I reported the Whistleblower post to FB. Researcher Dan Macy and I found out that this source of fake news has a complicated back story. We expend little if any effort verifying authenticity. After receiving several complaints from viewers about biased PBS material circulating on social media, we set out to see who or what was behind PBS.
So were we. We called CSC and were referred to Twitter, whom we then began pelting with requests for comment, via …. I'm not sure how your initial email was lost.
Looking into this for you. After s everal weeks passed we sent another email to Ms. Kelley to follow up — this time to her direct email address at Twitter — but she did not reply. How the web address became a fake-news bazaar remains a mystery. If you put PBS. He found suspicious sites with no single owner. Still, PBS. One of our earnest tech wizards then discovered a possible, more innocuous origin story for PBS.
The PBS part of the suspicious address is actually a clumsy acronym. The Blobstore was set up to isolate not just "bad" files, but all image files that accompany tweets. Our IT specialist found this during his deep dive into the subject:. The front-end understands where a given photo needs to be written, and forwards it on to the servers responsible for actually storing the data.
These storage servers, which we call storage nodes, write the photo to a disk and then inform a Metadata store that the image has been written and instruct it to record the information required to retrieve the photo The Metadata store Data researcher Jorge Melchor added that Twitter tries to isolate potentially harmful material that comes onto the platform:.
But somehow fake news producers use this isolation to instead reproduce a PBS link. The World Wide Web is a complex universe, bountiful with unintended consequences.
It might not seem like a big deal.
0コメント